Book Review: The House of Silk, New Sherlock Holmes Novel

ImageThis is a book I would have never ever bought myself simply because I am cynic and did not really believe someone could pull off a Sherlock spinoff with same panache. I am only happy to admit that I was proven wrong.

Just under first 20 pages, I could sense Anthony Horowitz has stepped fairly well into Watson’s shoes. It begins, as did all Doyle stories, with Holmes making his remarks and surprising people with his deductions.

The House of Silk is an investigation conducted by Holmes that was believed to be too horrific in nature to be revealed at the time. Therefore, Watson records this investigation in the twilight years of his life, after the death of Sherlock Holmes, with instruction that it should be published a century after his death.

The case begins when the client walks into the now familiar house at 221B, Baker Street. The client is Edmund Carstairs, an art gallery co-owner. He has had a brief brush with a gang in past which once destroyed his paintings. He believes he is now being followed by the one of the gang members for vendetta. Mr. Holmes is intrigued but relaxed. Events take an unpredictable course when one of the street urchins – part of Wiggin’s army – assisting him is brutally murdered. Holmes, regretful for unknowingly putting an innocent urchin in the harm’s way, is determined to bring the killer to justice. This leads both Holmes and Watson on a journey where there are several traps, guns and pitfalls. Meanwhile, Edmund Carstairs’ family seems to be disintegrating. Holmes must not only find the killer but save his reputation by stopping what is assailing the Carstairs, who like everybody else seem to be losing their faith in him.

Like Hound of Baskervillies, there comes a part in the story where Watson is at the helm of events with Holmes in trouble. Watson works on his own for a while with the help he can find from his two most likely allies -Inspector Lestrade and Mycroft. Lestrade, who was previously a mere caricaturised policeman is depicted more kindly in Watson’s memoir. Amusingly, Watson’s memoir takes a mildly apologetic tone for chronicling Lestrade as ‘rat-faced’ and ‘ferret-faced’.  On the other hand, Mycroft, with his invisible power inside the government corridors (and Diogenes Club) is as eccentric as ever. Watson is stumped when in his darkest hour, Mycroft bids him goodbye saying, Next time please call on me only when it is urgent situation.

Watson himself is very well done character in this book. He almost always flushes with pride to be known as a ‘good chronicler of Holmes’ adventures’. He still seeks to find expression of love, concern and pride from his dearest friend, Holmes. But unlike Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes movies, this was never the focal point in Doyle’s story. It was always subtly inherent – never dwelt upon in detail and yet there. Horowitz does a Guy Ritchie in my opinion when Watson confessed that with his preoccupation with Holmes during this case, he fails to recognise his wife Mary may have had typhoid, which is what claims her life later. Also, at one point in the book a tired and visibly sick Mary beseeches Watson to go to Holmes’ aid with these words, ‘…he needs you as he has always needed you. You cannot refuse.’ I, a true blue Doyle fan, consider this a flaw in the book. But that needs a separate post.

The author’s descriptions of Victorian London and its people are very evocative and reminiscent of Doyle’s stories. One description goes as this: He was formally dressed in a dark tail coat, wing collar and white bow tie with a black cloak around his shoulders, waistcoat, gloves and patent leather shoes. Behold, there appears a man in my imagination dressed like that. (Though I had to goggle ‘wing collar’ to get the exact look. :P)

Despite strong characterisations and writing, it seemed Horowitz felt very compelled to illustrate that he is very well-versed with Doyle’s works. There are so many cross-references to Holmes’ other cases – Miss Violet Hunter, The Red-Headed League, Riechenbach Falls and Prof. Moriarty himself. Some of these as Dr Trevelyan have been well-used in plot, but, it was the appearance of Prof. Moriarty that I felt was bit forced.

Despite this, I believe ‘House of Silk’ is worthy addition to Holmes’ collection. Though it will never be my favourite Holmes story, it will be certainly one of the most memorable.

P.S: I must thank Debs for generously passing this book my way, or am sure I would missed the pleasure of reading and finding more about the realm of Holmes.

14 Responses to “Book Review: The House of Silk, New Sherlock Holmes Novel”

  1. 1 brijwhiz January 30, 2012 at 10:24 am

    Agree with most of the review. I did go in with more expectations and as a result did not end up giving it full marks. However it is surely worth reading. Most of all I believe that this will give a new lease of life to Holmes.

  2. 2 Poonam January 30, 2012 at 10:14 pm

    Brijwhiz: Thanks for your comment. I do believe the expectations with which we go to read a book/watch a movie do determine our overall feeling/experience about the book. Other day there were these girls on Twitter (even at work) were raving how they still have fun watching ‘You Have Got the Mail’. Now, I watched it quite late in my life – and I couldn’t understand what the fuss was about. To me, it was a outdated, slow movie shot dingily about love over email. Perhaps had I watched that movie bit early with no expectation that ‘hey, here is a classic’ – maybe I would have appreciated it bit more.

  3. 3 Hypermom February 2, 2012 at 12:18 am

    I am reading a blog after months. It was a pleasant surprise to see your posts back!

  4. 5 Chittaranjan February 2, 2012 at 11:58 pm

    Hmm….I saw this at Landmark but the price put me off. Plus the skecpticism that that no one else could have written Holmes & Watson as Sir Arthur!

  5. 7 Reema February 16, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    Oh I had pre-ordered the book and havent finished it yet!! you beat me to its review 🙂

    • 8 Poonam Sharma February 16, 2012 at 9:44 pm

      You pre-ordered it! Like I said, I didn’t think anyone could be as good as Doyle’s Holmes. Once you dig into this book, it is actually a pretty fast read. Read and let me know what you think. 🙂

  6. 9 buddy2blogger June 5, 2012 at 2:45 am

    Always a pleasure to meet a Sherlockian 🙂

    Nice review of the book. I too liked this pastiche.

    Check out my review .


    • 10 Poonam Sharma June 6, 2012 at 12:02 pm

      Hey there, thanks for your comment. I did check your review – you have made your business to check out all things Sherlockian. I have read all Holmes’ stories but have not watched all adaptations in TV shows. Though I will admit to like BBC’s Sherlock Season 1. Season 2 not so much. 🙂

  7. 11 SD June 11, 2012 at 11:28 pm

    I am a cynic too and do not believe anyone can ever match up to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. However, will try to read this book, if not to reaffirm my convictions. 😛

  8. 12 ANILA NAIR November 6, 2012 at 11:04 am

    All reviews are good. Keep going. 🙂

  1. 1 Review: The House of Silk: The New Sherlock Holmes Novel « The Whiz’s Crucible Trackback on January 30, 2012 at 10:45 am
  2. 2 Book: The House of Silk | taking a break Trackback on November 12, 2012 at 9:41 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Subscribe to Visceral Observations

Add to Technorati Favorites

Thank you, Chirag!

This header has been created by Chirag.

A Torch Against Terrorists


I also write at:

Blog Archives

Read by Category

World AIDS Day 2008

Support World AIDS Day
The Hunger Site
Creative Commons License
Visceral Observations is written by Poonam Sharma. It is licensed to her under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License
Directory of General Blogs
January 2012

%d bloggers like this: