Satyajit Ray: Speaking of Films

I did not regret my decision to buy Satyajit Ray’s book Speaking of Films for even a second. After seeing my friend off, I started reading the book while traveling on my way back home. I was completely captivated by the book for next hour. So much that after the Metro dropped me at the station near my home, I headed straight to a small park that was en route my home. My reading continued, while I had comfortably ensconced myself in a bench at park. My reading was interrupted only when I received an anxious call about my whereabouts from my grand father on my cell phone.

The book in question is an insightful beginner’s guide to the art of film making. Speaking of Films is a collection of Satyajit Ray’s writings on cinema that were published in 1976. Ray is India’s most prolific director who has also penned several memorable characters and stories in his books. His Apu triology movies—Pather Panchali, Aparajito, and Apur Sansar are some of his best known work. He won a special lifetime achievement Oscar award 1992 just a few days before his death. As a kid, I remember reading in Bournvita Quiz Book about Ray’s famous reaction when he lifted the Oscar while in his sick-bed. It was something like, “It’s so heavy!”

This book begins with Ray recounting the story of his life and work. He loved music. He left no stone unturned to explore all the music that caught his fancy. He wanted to become a commercial artist. He joined Tagore’s Shantiniketan against his own wishes “in deference of his mother’s wishes.” He dropped in the middle of his five-year course at Kala Bhawan—College of Arts and Crafts at Shantiniketan. Shantiniketan groomed him to discover his roots. His repertoire of work has been clearly indicative of culture and development of Bengali cinema. He had, learned two other things from Shantiniketan that would perhaps later aid him as a film maker- to look at paintings and nature.

He traces an enlightening outline of evolution of cinema from the silent era to the color films. Though he chiefly speaks about evolution of Bengali cinema, he has also recorded the development of other cinema such as Soviet cinema in some articles. He speaks about every aspect of film making—adaptations from book, imagery, script writing, music, dialogue, use of color, etc. As if to present an example, there is a chapter “The Making of a Film: Structure, Language, and Style” that explains frame-by-frame how a scene from the original book has been translated into his movie Pather Panchali. He speaks about old films like De Sica’s Bicycle Thieves that influenced him deeply. He keeps referring to tidbits from Soviet Russia’s Sergei Eisenstein, whom he considers one of the greatest directors of the world. His unmistakable admiration for Eisenstein’s lectures and theories is so profuse, I decide to Google Eisenstein at the next opportunity available.

Ray writes about difficulties directors face while adapting books into films. The difference is in the language of the medium. Writers use words in their books, while film directors use images and sounds to narrate their stories. He enumerates several examples of challenges encountered by him while translating various stories from books that often lacked visual details into his screenplays. He explains his discontent with available Bengali literature with these words:

“I don’t now if it is a reflection of the Bengali temperament, but many of our writers seem more inclined to use their minds, rather than their eyes and ears. In other words, there is a marked tendency to avoid concrete observation.” (22)

He deftly analyzes his movie Charulata, based on Tagore’s story Nastneeer, to defend why a director needs to invent or modify details while narrating the same story from the original book on the large screen. Perhaps if you read Ray’s analysis on the subject, you will gladly absolve the sins committed by likes of Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Pradeep Sarkar, who presented their magnum opus adaptation of original novels of Sharat Chandra Chattopadhyay in Devdas and Parineeta respectively.

Ray is open in expressing his admiration and reverence for the Bengali writer Bibhuti Bhushan Bandopadhyay. Most of Ray’s famous films such as Pather Panchai, Ashani Sanket, Aparjito, Apur Sansar have been based on the works of Bibhuti Bhushan.

Ray candidly writes, “If film books did not help me much, I was helped enormously by Bibhuti Bhushan. He is one writer whose stories are a gold mine of cinematic observation, and it is fortunate that I developed a taste for him right at the start of my career. Even in his lesser works—and there aren’t many that rise to the heights of Pather Panchali and Aranyak—his eye and ear produce marvels of observation.”(19)

He goes to the extent of advising the aspiring screenplay writers:

“However, if a scriptwriter wishes to learn how to writes such lines by studying literature, I can recommend one writer without slightest hesitation. He is the late Bibhuti Bhushan Bandopadhyay. No other writer can be looked upon as a guru in the matter of writing dialogue for a film script.”(122) :mrgreen:

Ray goes on to express his views on the complicated love-hate relationship between a film critic and movie director. He asserts that it is a critic’s main responsibility to “build a bridge between the director and audience.” A critic, according to Ray, should “substantiate his praise or criticism with appropriate evidence.” Ray is quite merciless when he counters his critics:

“From the lines quoted from Bibhuti Bhushan, it becomes quite clear that the critic has neither read Pather Panchali nor Aparajito with care; or else the only intention behind quoting these lines was to belittle the script of Apur Sansar.” (136)

Sample his following comments for another unfortunate critic, Mr. Rudra:

“I do not know if Mr. Rudra understands anything of literature. Of films he understands nothing, but it is not just that. He doesn’t understand when things are explained to him. In other words, he is totally beyond redemption. He may have seen good films abroad. But who has told him that anyone who has seen good films can automatically appreciate them, or has the write to write about them?” (143) 👿

And unlike his critics, Ray never fails substantiate his counterpoints with rock hard evidence.

When I was in school, I had often heard cynics complaining that Ray only chose to showcase rural Indiain his movies, did he find urbane India lacking the soul of nation? Ray confronts this with two practical reasons: mounting costs and the problems that crop due to huge crowds that always assemble during the shooting of a movie in Indian cities.

Ray reminisces characters, actors from his movies and stray incidents that occurred during the making of his various films. He concludes his writings with:

“….., I can say at least this much with confidence: if I read a good story, or think of one, I can now turn it into something suitable for cinema and present it in a cohesive form. ….”

Fair enough, Mr. Ray!

13 Responses to “Satyajit Ray: Speaking of Films”

  1. 1 Jerry March 6, 2007 at 8:05 am

    Hi poonam
    didnt know where to put this
    u can go tru these links for more details

  2. 2 Jerry March 6, 2007 at 11:50 am

    wow.. that indeed is a privilege…
    ok… for adding the Image .. do this …
    Add the image as Full Size + Link to File. Once this is done resize it by dragging it by the corner of the image (in some cases u might have to use the combo of Shift/Ctrl Key to maintain the aspect ratio). The clarity might be lost, but since u gave link to file, the visitor can click the image to get a full view.
    hope it helps ..

  3. 3 mahendrap July 20, 2007 at 9:25 am

    Hi, thanks for sharing your observations about the book. Ray’s thoughts about adapting books into films and the role of the critic are very insightful!

  4. 4 Poonam Sharma August 13, 2007 at 4:15 am

    Hi Mahendra,

    Thanks for letting me know that the book review was helpful. It is comments like this that makes all the writing worthwhile.

    Come back again and add your thoughts to the blog.


  5. 5 Nita June 27, 2008 at 1:21 pm

    I came here from your comment on mahendra’s post. This book sounds very interesting Poonam and in your usual analytical style you have done a good job with this post.
    I don’t think I knew you then, in march 2007 but you seem to have known Mahendra. I always wondered how you found my blog, and I thought it was through Ruhi’s. But now I can ask – how did you stumble upon my blog and ask me for that interview?

  6. 6 Poonam June 27, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    Nita, I am glad you liked the post.

    I had just started blogging then. Mahendra, I don’t know how stumbled at this post, I knew little about other blogs then. But web has a long ememory.

    I think Nita I found your blog through google search, I don’t remember exactly searching what. I saw that you had a body of work there and were dealing with topics about India. I kept coming, I read the discussions. I was lurker at first as I saw there were too many comments already. Its a busy blog that you have there. Then I was hooked. I found Ruhi’s blog much later than I found yours. In Ruhi’s case, she found me. Though Nova had told me about Ruhi in passing.

  7. 7 Nita June 27, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    That was satisfying! 🙂 You know I have this strange intense curiousity about these things specially about people. People mean a lot to me and my blog friends do too. I even thought of writing a post on how I found each person and I realised I didn’t know! I know about a few (where I found them I mean) like Prerna (she used to comment on Mutiny( or Rdoc (through Mahendra) or Ruhi (she came to my blog through a post on Fergusson college) but many others I just don’t know! Nova through you ofcourse. I know this is off-topic and you can delete this comment if you want.

  8. 8 Poonam Sharma June 30, 2008 at 1:59 pm

    @Nita: Let it be here, it will be testimony of a conversation. That is we blog, to communicate.

  9. 9 Mahendra April 30, 2009 at 7:42 am

    Returned here after a long time to re-read your post. Once again, thank you for describing the book in lovely detail. I will buy this book some day, when my to-read list becomes more manageable!

    Also, fascinating to read the dialogue between you and Nita! 🙂

  10. 10 Ravi May 3, 2009 at 3:41 am

    Nice writeup, one of the greatest auteur of world cinema.

  11. 11 sathya February 29, 2012 at 10:56 pm

    hi poonam,
    this s sathya from bangalore.your review about the book speaking of films is good.. yesterday only i came to know about this book..u know the famous iranian director majid majidi said in one interview that he was grown up by watching sathyajit ray movies…unfortunately i dint see any onne of the ray movies….i vl try…..poonam one more director called adoor gopalkrishanan. his autobiograghy is relaesed so long back….have u read that… speciality of adoor gopalkrishanan sir is in his movie there wont be any clashes between the charaqcters…….i like ur desh bhakthi….can u please suggest any good books for filmmaking…
    all the best ……..keep educating us like this…..

    • 12 Poonam Sharma March 26, 2012 at 10:01 pm

      Thanks for the comment. I have seen Majid Majidi’s movies and like his work, good to know Ray inspired him. No I haven’t read Adoor’s autobiography. But I believe, two flim books you might like to read maybe – ‘A Story of Film’ by Mark Cousins and ‘Its Only a Movie’, biography of Hitchcock.

  1. 1 Actors and Actresses » Satyajit Ray: Speaking of Films Visceral Observations Trackback on February 4, 2008 at 3:11 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Subscribe to Visceral Observations

Add to Technorati Favorites

Thank you, Chirag!

This header has been created by Chirag.

A Torch Against Terrorists



I also write at:

Blog Archives

Read by Category

World AIDS Day 2008

Support World AIDS Day
The Hunger Site
Creative Commons License
Visceral Observations is written by Poonam Sharma. It is licensed to her under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License
Directory of General Blogs
March 2007

%d bloggers like this: